usyd School of Psychology
Faculty of Science
  Dr David Alais PhD (University of Sydney)
  Back to Homepage...  

 

Publications

Books

Book Chapters

Refereed Journal Articles

 

 

Books (menu)

D Alais, R Blake (Eds). Binocular Rivalry and Perceptual Ambiguity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2005).

 

Book Chapters (menu)

  1. D Burr, D Alais (2006). Combining visual and auditory information. In “Vision Perception”, Progress in Brain Research.
  2. D Alais (2005). Attentional modulation of motion adaptation. In C Clifford, G Rhodes (Eds.), Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. A Freeman, V Nguyen, D Alais (2005). The nature and depth of binocular rivalry suppression. In D Alais, R Blake (Eds.) Binocular Rivalry and Perceptual Ambiguity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. J Culham, T Ledgeway, S Nishida, P Cavanagh, M von Grunau, M Kwas, D Alais, J Raymond. Higher order motion aftereffects (1998). In G Mather, S Anstis, F Verstraten (Eds.), The Motion After-effect: A Modern Prospective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

Refereed Journal Articles (menu)

  1. J Cooper, S Carlile, D Alais (2008). Distortions of auditory space during rapid head turns. Experimental Brain Research (in press)
  2. K Allen, D Alais, S Carlile (2008). Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention. Perception & Psychophysics (in press)
  3. R Bhardwaj, R O’Shea, D Alais, A Parker (2008). Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images. Journal of Vision 8(11), 1-13. http://journalofvision.org/8/11/2 .
  4. J Leung, D Alais, S Carlile (2008). Compression of auditory space during rapid head turns. PNAS 105, 6492-7.
  5. J van Boxtel, D Alais, R van Ee (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision 8(5), 1-10. http://journalofvision.org/8/5/17 .
  6. J van Boxtel, D Alais, C Erkelens, R van Ee (2008). The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE 3, e1429.
  7. K Allen, D Alais, S Carlile (2008). The contribution of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 1562-70.
  8. A Parker, D Alais (2007). A bias for looming to predominate in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 47, 2661-74.
  9. D Alais, D Melcher (2007) Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-79.
  10. D Alais, A Parker (2006) Independent binocular rivalry processes for form and motion. Neuron 52, 911-20.
  11. J Cass, D Alais (2006) Evidence for two interacting temporal channels in human visual processing. Vision Research, 46, 2859-68.
  12. C Paffen, D Alais, F Verstraten (2006) Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science, 17, 752-6.
  13. D Burr, D Alais (2006). Combining visual and auditory information. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 243-58.
  14. D Alais, C Morrone, D Burr (2006) Separate attentional resources for vision and audition. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 273, 1339-45.
  15. L Bowns, D Alais (2006) Large shifts in perceived motion direction reveal multiple global motion solutions. Vision Research 46, 1170-77.
  16. D Alais, J Lorenceau, R Arrighi, J Cass (2006) Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field. Vision Research 46, 1473-87.
  17. R Arrighi, D Alais, D Burr (2006) Perceptual synchrony of audio-visual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences. Journal of Vision, 6, 260-68, http://journalofvision.org/6/3/6/.
  18. J Cass, D Alais (2006). The mechanisms of collinear integration. Journal of Vision, 6, 915-22, http://journalofvision.org/6/9/5/.
  19. C Paffen, D Alais, F Verstraten (2005) Centre-surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research 45, 2642-9.
  20. R Arrighi, D Alais, D Burr (2005) Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and audition. Experimental Brain Research 166, 445-54.
  21. R Arrighi, D Alais, D Burr (2005) Neural latencies do not explain the auditory or the audio-visual flash-lag effect. Vision Research 45, 2917-25.
  22. D Alais, S Carlile (2005) Synchronising to real events: Subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound. PNAS, 102, 2244-7.
  23. D Alais, F Verstraten, D Burr (2005) The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: two temporal channels account for perceived direction. Vision Research, 45, 403-12.
  24. D Li, A Freeman, D Alais (2005) Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 1255-63.
  25. O Carter, J Pettigrew, D Burr, D Alais, F Hasler, F Vollenweider (2004) The hallucinogenic serotonin agonist psilocybin affects high-level but not low-level motion mechanisms in humans. NeuroReport 15, 1947-1951.
  26. D Alais, D Burr (2004) No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 19, 185-94.
  27. D Alais, D Burr (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal cross-modal integration. Current Biology 14, 257-62.
  28. V Nguyen, A Freeman, D Alais (2003) Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 43, 2003-8.
  29. D Alais, D Burr (2003) The “flash-lag” effect occurs in audition and cross-modally. Current Biology 13, 1-5.
  30. D Alais, J Lorenceau (2002) Perceptual grouping in the Ternus display: Evidence for an ‘association field’ in apparent motion. Vision Research 42, 1005-1016.
  31. J Lorenceau, D Alais (2001) Form constraints in motion binding. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 745-51.
  32. D Alais, R O’Shea, C Mesana-Alais, I Wilson (2000) On binocular alternation. Perception 29, 1437-1445.
  33. D Alais, R Blake (1999) Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation. Nature Neuroscience 2, 1015-1018.
  34. D Alais, R Blake (1999) Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39, 4341-4353.
  35. D Burke, D Alais, P Wenderoth (1999) Determinants of fusion of dichoptically presented orthogonal gratings. Perception 28, 73-88.
  36. R Blake, U Ahlström, D Alais (1999) Perceptual priming to invisible motion. Psychological Science 10, 145-150.
  37. D Alais (1999). Spatial structure from temporal change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 293.
  38. D Alais, R Blake, S Lee (1998) Visual features that vary together over time group together over space. Nature Neuroscience 1, 160-164.
  39. D Alais, M van der Smagt, A van den Berg, W van de Grind (1998) Local and global factors affecting the coherent motion of gratings presented in multiple apertures. Vision Research 38, 1581-1591.
  40. D Alais, R Blake (1998) Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Research 38, 637-644.
  41. D Alais, P Wenderoth, D Burke (1997) The size and number of plaid blobs contribute to the direction perception of type II plaids. Vision Research 37, 143-150.
  42. D Alais, M van der Smagt, F Verstraten, W van de Grind (1996) Monocular mechanisms determine perceived plaid coherence. Visual Neuroscience 13, 615-626.
  43. D Alais, D Burke, P Wenderoth (1996) Further evidence for monocular determinants of perceived plaid direction. Vision Research 36, 1247-1253.
  44. D Alais, M van der Smagt, F Verstraten, W van de Grind (1995) The perceived direction of motion and motion aftereffects using textured gratings. Perception 24, 1383- 1396.
  45. D Alais, P Wenderoth, D Burke (1994) The contribution of 1-D motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their aftereffects. Vision Research 34, 1823-1834.
  46. D Burke, D Alais, P Wenderoth (1994) A role for a low-level mechanism in determining plaid coherence. Vision Research 34, 3189-3196.
  47. P Wenderoth, D Alais, D Burke, R van der Zwan (1994) The role of 'blobs' in determining perception of drifting plaids and motion aftereffects. Perception 23, 1163- 69.
  48. R van der Zwan, P Wenderoth, D Alais (1993) Reduction of pattern-induced motion aftereffect by binocular rivalry suggests the involvement of extrastriate mechanisms.Visual Neuroscience 10, 703-709.
  49. P Wenderoth, D Alais (1990) Lack of evidence for a tactual Poggendorff illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 234-242.

 

©2008 School of Psychology, University of Sydney  
Last update 7 November 2007 webmaster@psych.usyd.edu.au